Re: ipkg Vs emdeb
- To: Henrion Benjamin <bh@udev.org>
- Cc: debian-embedded@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ipkg Vs emdeb
- From: Philippe De Swert <philippedeswert@scarlet.be>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:33:59 +0100
- Message-id: <1105306439.21218.137.camel@localhost.localdomain>
- In-reply-to: <20050108143223.GA29387@localhost>
- References: <20050108143223.GA29387@localhost>
Hi Benjamin,
On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 15:32 +0100, Henrion Benjamin wrote:
> I would like to know which package system is the best between ipkg and
> emdeb.
Emdebian would use the normal debian package format. (With some wrappers
around apt/dpkg you can actually install them in a chroot concurrently
on your system). Also the ipkg package manager can deal with deb
packages, as the two formats are quite similar.
However ipkg has a less robust dependency management, and does not
fetches packages as well as apt does. Also there is no support for
orphaned packages, upgrading is much harder.... in respect to apt/dpkg.
(As far as I know of course)
> It seems to me that there is no standard way to get the sources from an
> ipk package, no?
There is no standard way that I know of. Most sources could probabaely
be found in the OE trees that are used by handhelds/familiar and
openzaurus.
| Philippe De Swert
|
| Stag developer http://stag.mind.be/
| Emdebian developer: http://www.emdebian.org
|
| Please do not send me documents in a closed format.
(*.doc,*.xls,*.ppt)
| Use the open alternatives. (*.pdf,*.ps,*.html,*.txt)
| Why? http://pallieter.is-a-geek.org:7832/~johan/word/english/
Reply to: