Previously Bruce Perens wrote: > I'm sorry, but I don't see much sense in carrying it on any longer. > If asked, I'd have to state that there is _not_ a licensing problem with > dpkg and get_it. So far, I haven't seen anything to convince me otherwise. FWIW, RMS also doesn't see a problem with this. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpJ5Gpk0fsmM.pgp
Description: PGP signature