Re: debian imagej
- To: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Cc: Johan Henriksson <mahogny@maia.areta.org>, paolo.ariano@unito.it, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: debian imagej
- From: Johan Henriksson <johan.henriksson@ki.se>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:51:58 +0200
- Message-id: <1241099518.1651.1.camel@naos>
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904301443440.29827@wr-linux02>
- References: <dd8886300904290122g68cf42e1uc593a9cd9fe45d1d@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904291254530.2642@wr-linux02> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904301443440.29827@wr-linux02>
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:57 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > The upload to Debian unstable can be done right after you confirm the
> > relation to bug #507824.
>
> Hmmm, I noticed there is a problem remaining which I even posted here
> but did not got any response[1]. So if there might be anybody willing
> to contact upstream about this problem (which was previousely solved by
> them for very similar issues but probably the new versions have a
> regression) we could go on upgrading imagej for Debian.
a related issue is that we now have two imagej debian packages (see:
Fiji). but Fiji is a lot more actively maintained so unless someone
decides to pick up our imagej package for real it might do more damage
than use.
/Johan
>
> Any volunteer?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2009/03/msg00149.html
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
Reply to: