Hi Gabriel, Gabriel Filion, on 2023-02-26: > I've changed the license file as suggested. I couldn't find the typo that's > mentioned below - lintian on my end seems happy - and I don't remember if I > had already fixed it before. The typo seems to have been fixed earlier in the git log indeed, so it's sorted now. Lintian didn't raise further issue about these sort of things. > Does the result in the salsa repository look good enough for an eventual new > package in the archive? > If so, as mentioned above, I'll wait for the appropriate time to request > help with sponsoring. Somehow, "dpt packagecheck" introduced a bogus message in the first log entry, which is otherwise supposed to only include the "Initial release." stanza. It's not critical, but atypical and it might be preferable to remove it before upload to "New". I ran a pass of "dpt fixup", and it caught a standards version bump, and rewrapped control files with "cme", but that's about all. I let you try it if you are curious; it shouldn't mess with your debian/changelog, but in doubt double check. Other than that, the package looks in pretty good shape and I think it shouldn't pose too much difficulties when you believe it should be good to go. Uploading now to unstable shouldn't be a big deal: the package will simply migrate automatically to testing after the release of bookworm. Ping the mailing list once you're happy with the state of your package in Salsa. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: Dreamscape - The End Of Light
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature