On 09/07/2011 11:54 PM, Paul Clements wrote:
> I named it differently intentionally, actually, because it should not use > the flags field from the network protocol as is. Also, "features" sounds > more like something that is optional, while unrecognized "flags" should > probably cause a failure.Alright, I can buy that argument -- I don't feel that strongly about it... This looks good to me, then.
Actually no, I can do better. :) Paolo