[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2419-1] puppet security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2419-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
February 27, 2012                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : puppet
Vulnerability  : several
Problem type   : local
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2012-1053 CVE-2012-1054

Two vulnerabilities were discovered in Puppet, a centralized
configuration management tool.

CVE-2012-1053
	Puppet runs execs with an unintended group privileges,
	potentially leading to privilege escalation.

CVE-2012-1054
	The k5login type writes to untrusted locations,
	enabling local users to escalate their privileges
	if the k5login type is used.

For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed
in version 2.6.2-5+squeeze4.

For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution
(sid), these problems have been fixed in version 2.7.11-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your puppet packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPS+FdAAoJEL97/wQC1SS+ZQQIAJSwK65I2Zu3vbszCf0Ba+AP
hVHLLNdyA56clrDwvqhIf7jncAY9BrkykVkML2fu8K8Zn8hn96r4GyZ1MkzWMBqK
Smf4tZTEr1fD0QGbXLmHCZGMosdZVg6RJtBwhfwG8QNBYjspBBzaQ0kixHMHxiam
KkYSuFcc1oLfVhJe0ubIIy30mIinaEpLQ6Sxhe75Cm8aIq7gUG60LSlxI5auKBZu
w4U52CRdfZPd8I0UIswudD9hEW8Chr7hfq9yBiANXhB8lHyFMpf9nrUNhiC7oAtK
i3GWGrKm71paTrS9aMva4c73/Mz9zqMlI905Nt0OgGJqMxqXbxOkE9YrjgKaQ5g=
=90wL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: