[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2436-1] libapache2-mod-fcgid security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2436-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                           Thijs Kinkhorst
March 19, 2012                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libapache2-mod-fcgid
Vulnerability  : inactive resource limits
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2012-1181
Debian Bug     : 615814

It was discovered that the Apache FCGID module, a FastCGI implementation,
did not properly enforce the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass resource limit,
rendering this control ineffective and potentially allowing a virtual
host to consume excessive resources.

For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 1:2.3.6-1+squeeze1.

For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem will be fixed soon.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 1:2.3.6-1.1.

We recommend that you upgrade your libapache2-mod-fcgid packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPZ4U8AAoJEOxfUAG2iX57K8kIAK+ux3WVWLKD4Tf7t3T5udBE
txQi5RPpP0YPtyRW3Kd96MxoSXupb4oarlCY27S/sneVyfOnpZo5BaLp0ODv7ijQ
vSjUQpvedLwI+kl2bLY19j4kHB+s0U1RVlKGePuTv1RjRhas7PiE/uSxJL5k2u98
9VswXCEIERdZcaGG/kaPBbtkRUTDVsBeJkwuZdTBRRmud0ZWItCiDE4HbZk50O7j
z20CS7IZaQDBZjKoMvbMCnQZr7tR1/qOGBIIwsiSB+VcOAVPxv5iO1tcPx5/dl93
Ip+I6uojsduLIaFkS6LF5u75izxSrmFOfkF0/uZ8ORfjRxiQ/Y5T8Q6yVaK4E9M=
=JNMH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: