[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2506-1] libapache-mod-security security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2506-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
July 02, 2012                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libapache-mod-security
Vulnerability  : modsecurity bypass
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2012-2751
Debian Bug     : #678529

Qualys Vulnerability & Malware Research Labs discovered a vulnerability in
ModSecurity, a security module for the Apache webserver. In situations where
both 'Content:Disposition: attachment' and 'Content-Type: multipart' were
present in HTTP headers, the vulernability could allow an attacker to bypass
policy and execute cross-site script (XSS) attacks through properly crafted
HTML documents.

For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.5.12-1+squeeze1.

For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.6.6-1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.6.6-1.

In testing and unstable distribution, the source package has been renamed to
modsecurity-apache.

We recommend that you upgrade your libapache-mod-security packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=3M0X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: