[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2554-1] iceape security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2554-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
September 26, 2012                     http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : iceape
Vulnerability  : several
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2012-1970 CVE-2012-1972 CVE-2012-1973 CVE-2012-1974 
                 CVE-2012-1975 CVE-2012-1976 CVE-2012-3959 CVE-2012-3962
                 CVE-2012-3969 CVE-2012-3972 CVE-2012-3978

Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in Iceape, an internet suite based
on Seamonkey.

The reported vulnerabilities could lead to the execution of arbitrary
code or the bypass of content-loading restrictions via the location
object.

For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.0.11-15.

For the testing distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.7.7-1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.7.7-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your iceape packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQY1DPAAoJEDBVD3hx7wuoHeQP/1K1AlAAaw9fubwyFuI4DVEQ
M6HpgcoxZsb9wfjl/KEqfsTf01MpEZzw/lZ2x6AZwFSOtAnwKRAxEbfNijsq+xuJ
fJQYBetMvXYUVCPUUGJGhqh7UEMuXR9ErRpeJTpdhdgI/0HRM6OG3i+Ne61gxBoW
man9nxd/2aZl4qkwb5aCiNYHY0ZYzUxiL/svqS4SWCcJdXRfxW2hyCWks2PyAsxr
nlFZGsuVw90f8DOtExTp3yXVc1yl40nRVeDF1kugxDaDXK/gsNUclIuqPu7NqMV0
2wdNQgdthxQUdaM/Dg8Zm1VNmjaVCtfDvT5MDQXSy9KH7djYBKQ8anMP8ViIh+vT
aA6OE9Qi1/gF/khW5q4S4aV2gKei9AHJOHZcvU9GQFjFC5Q8KCS5y8d0FE8RQZhg
s4mvf8fycRdIag6qkDLdqNZCuJJPgtkJXv2qg8NtFdlgIXw0M1MqIJnoZUKhbkdl
H2VmEWoiHx6LCUcu70FD2eWxrNk17iJXpVj75DsciR6ddqqvlc5W2fATX4z0vjTm
tBAJIBZpL1nYln30IghYEqXu2X6zDhrCi83zVWDneqMd7JKPMKfB1i2Woo/8jQZO
329bBIOiL89gC9xiOpJDDEKwXZgmSUERaNA6s8E8H1dZv+ucxplIEUs/l5ZJqEoB
uhlarj7gN2zbks21bpQv
=wRJq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: