[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2702-1] telepathy-gabble security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2702-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
June 03, 2013                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : telepathy-gabble
Vulnerability  : TLS verification bypass
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-1431

Maksim Otstavnov discovered that the Wocky submodule used by
telepathy-gabble, the Jabber/XMPP connection manager for the Telepathy
framework, does not respect the tls-required flag on legacy Jabber
servers. A network intermediary could use this vulnerability to bypass
TLS verification and perform a man-in-the-middle attack.

For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.9.15-1+squeeze2.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.16.5-1+deb7u1.

For the testing distribution (jessie) and the unstable distribution
(sid), this problem has been fixed in version 0.16.6-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your telepathy-gabble packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=nfk7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: