[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2768-1] icedtea-web security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2768-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
October 04, 2013                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : icedtea-web
Vulnerability  : heap-based buffer overflow
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-4349
Debian Bug     : 723118

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in icedtea-web, a
web browser plugin for running applets written in the Java programming
language. If a user were tricked into opening a malicious website, an
attacker could cause the plugin to crash or possibly execute arbitrary
code as the user invoking the program.

This problem was initially discovered by Arthur Gerkis and got assigned
CVE-2012-4540. Fixes where applied in the 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 branches but
not to the 1.4 branch.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.4-3~deb7u2.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.4-3.1.

We recommend that you upgrade your icedtea-web packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=V9dh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: