[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2850-1] libyaml security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2850-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
January 31, 2014                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libyaml
Vulnerability  : heap-based buffer overflow
Problem type   : local (remote)
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-6393
Debian Bug     : 737076

Florian Weimer of the Red Hat Product Security Team discovered a
heap-based buffer overflow flaw in LibYAML, a fast YAML 1.1 parser and
emitter library. A remote attacker could provide a YAML document with a
specially-crafted tag that, when parsed by an application using libyaml,
would cause the application to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary
code with the privileges of the user running the application.

For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.1.3-1+deb6u2.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.1.4-2+deb7u2.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.1.4-3.

We recommend that you upgrade your libyaml packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=6Zgd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: