[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2885-1] libyaml-libyaml-perl security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2885-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
March 26, 2014                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libyaml-libyaml-perl
CVE ID         : CVE-2014-2525

Ivan Fratric of the Google Security Team discovered a heap-based buffer
overflow vulnerability in LibYAML, a fast YAML 1.1 parser and emitter
library. A remote attacker could provide a specially-crafted YAML
document that, when parsed by an application using libyaml, would cause
the application to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code with
the privileges of the user running the application.

This update corrects this flaw in the copy that is embedded in the
libyaml-libyaml-perl package.

For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.33-1+squeeze3.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.38-3+deb7u2.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.41-5.

We recommend that you upgrade your libyaml-libyaml-perl packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=hEn9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: