[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2895-1] prosody security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2895-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                             Luciano Bello
April 06, 2014                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : prosody

A denial-of-service vulnerability has been reported in Prosody, a XMPP 
server. If compression is enabled, an attacker might send highly-com-
pressed XML elements (attack known as "zip bomb") over XMPP streams and 
consume all the resources of the server.

The SAX XML parser lua-expat is also affected by this issues.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.8.2-4+deb7u1 of prosody.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.9.4-1 of prosody.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.2.0-5+deb7u1 of lua-expat.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.3.0-1 lua-expat.

We recommend that you upgrade your prosody and lua-expat packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=SKLx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: