[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3045-1] qemu security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3045-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
October 04, 2014                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : qemu
CVE ID         : CVE-2014-0142 CVE-2014-0143 CVE-2014-0144 CVE-2014-0145 
                 CVE-2014-0146 CVE-2014-0147 CVE-2014-0222 CVE-2014-0223
                 CVE-2014-3615 CVE-2014-3640

Several vulnerabilities were discovered in qemu, a fast processor 
emulator:

* Various security issues have been found in the block qemu drivers. 
  Malformed disk images might result in the execution of arbitrary code.
* A NULL pointer dereference in SLIRP may result in denial of service
* An information leak was discovered in the VGA emulation

For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u4.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems will be fixed soon.

We recommend that you upgrade your qemu packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=TGwF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: