[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3201-1] iceweasel security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3201-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
March 22, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : iceweasel
CVE ID         : CVE-2015-0817 CVE-2015-0818

Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version
of the Mozilla Firefox web browser. The Common Vulnerabilities and
Exposures project identifies the following problems:

CVE-2015-0817

    ilxu1a reported a flaw in Mozilla's implementation of typed array
    bounds checking in JavaScript just-in-time compilation (JIT) and its
    management of bounds checking for heap access. This flaw can be
    leveraged into the reading and writing of memory allowing for
    arbitary code execution on the local system.

CVE-2015-0818

    Mariusz Mlynski discovered a method to run arbitrary scripts in a
    privileged context. This bypassed the same-origin policy protections
    by using a flaw in the processing of SVG format content navigation.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 31.5.3esr-1~deb7u1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 31.5.3esr-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=9pk6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: