[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3235-1] openjdk-7 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3235-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
April 24, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : openjdk-7
CVE ID         : CVE-2015-0460 CVE-2015-0469 CVE-2015-0470 CVE-2015-0477 
                 CVE-2015-0478 CVE-2015-0480 CVE-2015-0488

Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an
implementation of the Oracle Java platform, resulting in the execution
of arbitrary code, breakouts of the Java sandbox, information disclosure
or denial of service.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 7u79-2.5.5-1~deb7u1.

For the upcoming stable distribution (jessie), these problems will be
fixed soon in version 7u79-2.5.5-1~deb8u1 (the update will be available
shortly after the final jessie release).

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 7u79-2.5.5-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-7 packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=3UwI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: