[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3251-1] dnsmasq security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3251-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
May 05, 2015                           http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : dnsmasq
CVE ID         : CVE-2015-3294
Debian Bug     : 783459

Nick Sampanis discovered that dnsmasq, a small caching DNS proxy and
DHCP/TFTP server, did not properly check the return value of the
setup_reply() function called during a TCP connection, which is used
then as a size argument in a function which writes data on the client's
connection. A remote attacker could exploit this issue via a specially
crafted DNS request to cause dnsmasq to crash, or potentially to obtain
sensitive information from process memory.

For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
in version 2.62-3+deb7u2.

For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.72-3+deb8u1.

For the testing distribution (stretch) and the unstable distribution
(sid), this problem will be fixed soon.

We recommend that you upgrade your dnsmasq packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2AQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: