[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3271-1] nbd security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3271-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                        Alessandro Ghedini
May 23, 2015                           http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : nbd
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-7441 CVE-2015-0847
Debian Bug     : 781547 784657

Tuomas Räsänen discovered that unsafe signal handling in nbd-server, the
server for the Network Block Device protocol, could allow remote
attackers to cause a deadlock in the server process and thus a denial of
service.

Tuomas Räsänen also discovered that the modern-style negotiation was
carried out in the main server process before forking the actual client
handler. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service
(crash) by querying a non-existent export. This issue only affected the
oldstable distribution (wheezy).

For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
in version 1:3.2-4~deb7u5.

For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:3.8-4+deb8u1.

For the testing distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
in version 1:3.10-1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:3.10-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your nbd packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=UsE0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: