[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3278-1] libapache-mod-jk security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3278-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                           Markus Koschany
June 03, 2015                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libapache-mod-jk
CVE ID         : CVE-2014-8111
Debian Bug     : 783233

An information disclosure flaw due to incorrect JkMount/JkUnmount
directives processing was found in the Apache 2 module mod_jk to forward
requests from the Apache web server to Tomcat. A JkUnmount rule for a
subtree of a previous JkMount rule could be ignored. This could allow a
remote attacker to potentially access a private artifact in a tree that
would otherwise not be accessible to them.

For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
in version 1:1.2.37-1+deb7u1.

For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
version 1:1.2.37-4+deb8u1.

For the testing distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
in version 1:1.2.40+svn150520-1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 1:1.2.40+svn150520-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your libapache-mod-jk packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=M39D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: