[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3676-1] unadf security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3676-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                            Luciano Bello
September 24, 2016                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : unadf
CVE ID         : CVE-2016-1243 CVE-2016-1244
Debian Bug     : 838248

Tuomas Räsänen discovered two vulnerabilities in unADF, a tool to extract
files from an Amiga Disk File dump (.adf):

CVE-2016-1243

    A stack buffer overflow in the function extractTree() might allow an
    attacker, with control on the content of a ADF file, to execute
    arbitrary code with the privileges of the program execution.

CVE-2016-1244

    The unADF extractor creates the path in the destination via a mkdir
    in a system() call. Since there was no sanitization on the input of
    the filenames, an attacker can directly inject code in the pathnames
    of archived directories in an ADF file.
 
For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
in version 0.7.11a-3+deb7u1.

For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 0.7.11a-3+deb8u1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 0.7.11a-4.

We recommend that you upgrade your unadf packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=qLvU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: