[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 239-1] cups security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


Package        : cups
Version        : 1.4.4-7+squeeze8
CVE ID         : CVE-2015-1158 CVE-2015-1159

Two critical vulnerabilities have been found in the CUPS printing 
system:

CVE-2015-1158 - Improper Update of Reference Count
    Cupsd uses reference-counted strings with global scope. When parsing
    a print job request, cupsd over-decrements the reference count for a
    string from the request. As a result, an attacker can prematurely
    free an arbitrary string of global scope. They can use this to 
    dismantle ACL’s protecting privileged operations, and upload a
    replacement configuration file, and subsequently run arbitrary code
    on a target machine.

    This bug is exploitable in default configurations, and does not
    require any special permissions other than the basic ability to
    print.

CVE-2015-1159 - Cross-Site Scripting 
    A cross-site scripting bug in the CUPS templating engine allows the
    above bug to be exploited when a user browses the web. This XSS is
    reachable in the default configuration for Linux instances of CUPS,
    and allows an attacker to bypass default configuration settings that
    bind the CUPS scheduler to the ‘localhost’ or loopback interface.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=ASfW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: