[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 666-1] guile-2.0 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Package        : guile-2.0
Version        : 2.0.5+1-3+deb7u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2016-8605 CVE-2016-8606
Debian Bug     : 840555 840556


Several vulnerabilities were discovered in GNU Guile, an
implementation of the Scheme programming language. The Common
Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following issues.

CVE-2016-8605:
    The mkdir procedure of GNU Guile temporarily changed the process'
    umask to zero. During that time window, in a multithreaded
    application, other threads could end up creating files with
    insecure permissions.

CVE-2016-8606:
    GNU Guile provides a "REPL server" which is a command prompt that
    developers can connect to for live coding and debugging purposes.
    The REPL server is started by the '--listen' command-line option
    or equivalent API.

    It was reported that the REPL server is vulnerable to the HTTP
    inter-protocol attack.

    This constitutes a remote code execution vulnerability for
    developers running a REPL server that listens on a loopback device
    or private network. Applications that do not run a REPL server, as
    is usually the case, are unaffected.


For Debian 7 "Wheezy", these problems have been fixed in version
2.0.5+1-3+deb7u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your guile-2.0 packages.

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=9e39
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: