[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 728-1] tomcat6 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Package        : tomcat6
Version        : 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u3
CVE ID         : CVE-2016-0762 CVE-2016-5018 CVE-2016-6794
                 CVE-2016-6796 CVE-2016-6797 CVE-2016-6816
                 CVE-2016-8735
Debian Bug     : 841655 842662 842663 842664 842665 842666 845385


Multiple security vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Tomcat
servlet and JSP engine, which may result in possible timing attacks to
determine valid user names, bypass of the SecurityManager, disclosure of
system properties, unrestricted access to global resources, arbitrary
file overwrites, and potentially escalation of privileges.

In addition this update further hardens Tomcat's init and maintainer
scripts to prevent possible privilege escalations. Thanks to Paul
Szabo for the report.

This is probably the last security update of Tomcat 6 which will reach
its end-of-life exactly in one month. We strongly recommend to switch
to another supported version such as Tomcat 7 at your earliest
convenience.

For Debian 7 "Wheezy", these problems have been fixed in version
6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u3.

We recommend that you upgrade your tomcat6 packages.

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=C8gW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: