[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 1041-1] nasm security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Package        : nasm
Version        : 2.10.01-1+deb7u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2017-10686 CVE-2017-11111

CVE-2017-10686
     In Netwide Assembler (NASM) 2.14rc0, there are multiple heap use
     after free vulnerabilities in the tool nasm. The related heap is
     allocated in the token() function and freed in the detoken()
     function (called by pp_getline()) - it is used again at multiple
     positions later that could cause multiple damages. For example,
     it causes a corrupted double-linked list in detoken(), a double
     free or corruption in delete_Token(), and an out-of-bounds write
     in detoken(). It has a high possibility to lead to a remote code
     execution attack.

CVE-2017-11111
     In Netwide Assembler (NASM) 2.14rc0, preproc.c allows remote
     attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer
     overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified
     other impact via a crafted file.


For Debian 7 "Wheezy", these problems have been fixed in version
2.10.01-1+deb7u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your nasm packages.

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=eo6a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: