[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 977-1] freeradius security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Package        : freeradius
Version        : 2.1.12+dfsg-1.2+deb7u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2014-2015 CVE-2015-4680 CVE-2017-9148
Debian Bug     : 742820 789623 863673

Several issues were discovered in FreeRADIUS, a high-performance and
highly configurable RADIUS server.

CVE-2014-2015

    A stack-based buffer overflow was found in the normify function in
    the rlm_pap module, which can be attacked by existing users to
    cause denial of service or other issues.

CVE-2015-4680

    It was discovered that freeradius failed to check revocation of
    intermediate CA certificates, thus accepting client certificates
    issued by revoked certificates from intermediate CAs.

    Note that to enable checking of intermediate CA certificates, it
    is necessary to enable the check_all_crl option of the EAP TLS
    section in eap.conf. This is only necessary for servers using
    certificates signed by intermediate CAs. Servers that use
    self-signed CAs are unaffected.

CVE-2017-9148

    The TLS session cache fails to reliably prevent resumption of an
    unauthenticated session, which allows remote attackers (such as
    malicious 802.1X supplicants) to bypass authentication via PEAP or
    TTLS.

For Debian 7 "Wheezy", these problems have been fixed in version
2.1.12+dfsg-1.2+deb7u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your freeradius packages.

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=UFfp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: