[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 1603-1] suricata security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Package        : suricata
Version        : 2.0.7-2+deb8u3
CVE ID         : CVE-2017-7177 CVE-2017-15377 CVE-2018-6794
Debian Bug     : 856648 889842 856649

Several issues were found in suricata, an intrusion detection and
prevention tool.

CVE-2017-7177

    Suricata has an IPv4 defragmentation evasion issue caused by lack
    of a check for the IP protocol during fragment matching.

CVE-2017-15377

    It was possible to trigger lots of redundant checks on the content
    of crafted network traffic with a certain signature, because of
    DetectEngineContentInspection in detect-engine-content-inspection.c.
    The search engine doesn't stop when it should after no match is
    found; instead, it stops only upon reaching inspection-recursion-
    limit (3000 by default).

CVE-2018-6794

    Suricata is prone to an HTTP detection bypass vulnerability in
    detect.c and stream-tcp.c. If a malicious server breaks a normal
    TCP flow and sends data before the 3-way handshake is complete,
    then the data sent by the malicious server will be accepted by web
    clients such as a web browser or Linux CLI utilities, but ignored
    by Suricata IDS signatures. This mostly affects IDS signatures for
    the HTTP protocol and TCP stream content; signatures for TCP packets
    will inspect such network traffic as usual.

TEMP-0856648-2BC2C9 (no CVE assigned yet)

    Out of bounds read in app-layer-dns-common.c.
    On a zero size A or AAAA record, 4 or 16 bytes would still be read.

For Debian 8 "Jessie", these problems have been fixed in version
2.0.7-2+deb8u3.

We recommend that you upgrade your suricata packages.

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAlwG2NRfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD
RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQACgkQ2a0UuVE7
UeTzHQ/9H+wrxeKvjgXXdErkNOU4WLTmZyLXgUzC+wC6HZVTh+EEARxTARjtoVo6
oPSFDzM/ijQqDib/5ROX0Hqf962e2Uh85W54LeYfNRlLESejn0mHmQJbFlgQFCqw
GEmLp9v0nqXzXz2E6tKjfi7/QmAvkPddujkQqnW4AVuTBZEkdnuBpLK2Je7HoXh1
vfGkNKwbBTX/xqN76psH5rkUAcAGVIdCoZMko1UIbY2QVHXJ63tU0iW5Z0N9g/6y
0U7wp+hQNkuMPYpySUBMgo/YO4mOlOl1MGtbZ4lKcbbivrGig7LUhBGoAE12JOqZ
F5fGhuK/b8WVmh0sXbyDcjIzJp6JLU02cYoKfpvDfP6oFgQsfohSAQ2dEMqrqxoh
S/vm1iHktNjXuzbzN0XQ6P8Dr+pNqmfR6z9Qv3dBG3AzEd43WS2P3NMyAA1fHsm8
vrk3p8Tb1+EyqDBIFUkHzATc2xj7Ahll6zhuJHGCEC2UhoWbETUjXLtlhV9d0gMz
eM0XpAIKP+c/AHfBAI3n3PJ7chudsXgPwdCQg/fag5rKkyTVPbsCKUAOCU3WCIfc
KVhwurvJbo7QnE7zja92eH9Ws0hLeMdjaQFxtKfMAPnAmY/BxCqIqm7phOyGF47N
rP9cSz/AbWD6RCyE5481Tt/Z+8XFRXJgYv3oGZhPJIFvMMyVmJ4=
=lHBj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: