[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2020-1] libonig security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Package        : libonig
Version        : 5.9.5-3.2+deb8u4
CVE ID         : CVE-2019-19012 CVE-2019-19204 CVE-2019-19246
Debian Bug     : 944959 945313


Several vulnerabilities were discovered in the Oniguruma regular
expressions library, notably used in PHP mbstring.

CVE-2019-19012

    An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c
    leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read
    is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit
    compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service
    or information disclosure, or possibly have unspecified other
    impact, via a crafted regular expression.

CVE-2019-19204

    In the function fetch_range_quantifier in regparse.c, PFETCH is
    called without checking PEND. This leads to a heap-based buffer
    over-read and lead to denial-of-service via a crafted regular
    expression.

CVE-2019-19246

    Heap-based buffer over-read in str_lower_case_match in regexec.c
    can lead to denial-of-service via a crafted regular expression.

For Debian 8 "Jessie", these problems have been fixed in version
5.9.5-3.2+deb8u4.

We recommend that you upgrade your libonig packages.

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEQic8GuN/xDR88HkSj/HLbo2JBZ8FAl3ni78ACgkQj/HLbo2J
BZ82bAf+LAfwQoUSObKPUVNgH1U82sAiJL9xohrJxyX8KB6TQr2OMLTqGD8grAcO
I0sAOmvIGkCRLlYMwv+dl2q/lTaoYtXDc/1Ic2HajLKGUm4jkS2JZKTdkpQIvae1
ZZslqXKqORWYV36k6ljUVjeWNv6Yv6ZXP17OUCM4yUnXTZksvRoc7gA3ABsFpki2
dYlXGW9sPkdKEaa4spJMetys7jd9rD/nGASSy4HXva4gfxLsWm7nTvff4i9YX8P1
OaLTimYyQ2ojBqTdOSr51mgjXCelSE67PbEdSiI+9+yfK2A+z8JALehmGePgFMdv
3DfDNIc3uXvjbzuqfUErAlhbUpDO8g==
=HuGy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: