[SECURITY] [DLA 2314-1] clamav security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2314-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
August 06, 2020 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : clamav
Version : 0.102.4+dfsg-0+deb9u1
CVE ID : CVE-2020-3327 CVE-2020-3350 CVE-2020-3481
Several vulnerabilities have been found in the ClamAV antivirus toolkit:
CVE-2020-3327
An out of bounds read in the ARJ archive-parsing module could cause
denial of service. The fix in 0.102.3 was incomplete.
CVE-2020-3350
A malicious user could trick clamscan, clamdscan or clamonacc into
moving or removing a different file than intended when those are
used with one of the --move or --remove options. This could be used
to get rid of special system files.
CVE-2020-3481
The EGG archive module was vulnerable to denial of service via NULL
pointer dereference due to improper error handling. The official
signature database avoided this problem because the signatures there
avoided the use of the EGG archive parser.
For Debian 9 stretch, these problems have been fixed in version
0.102.4+dfsg-0+deb9u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your clamav packages.
For the detailed security status of clamav please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/clamav
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=BcAc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: