[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2327-1] lucene-solr security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2327-1               debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                     Markus Koschany
August 15, 2020                               htps://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : lucene-solr
Version        : 3.6.2+dfsg-10+deb9u3
CVE ID         : CVE-2019-0193

A security vulnerability was discovered in lucene-solr, an enterprise
search server.

The DataImportHandler, an optional but popular module to pull in data
from databases and other sources, has a feature in which the whole DIH
configuration can come from a request's "dataConfig" parameter. The
debug mode of the DIH admin screen uses this to allow convenient
debugging / development of a DIH config. Since a DIH config can contain
scripts, this parameter is a security risk. Starting from now on, use
of this parameter requires setting the Java System property
"enable.dih.dataConfigParam" to true. For example this can be achieved
with solr-tomcat by adding -Denable.dih.dataConfigParam=true to
JAVA_OPTS in /etc/default/tomcat8.

For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version
3.6.2+dfsg-10+deb9u3.

We recommend that you upgrade your lucene-solr packages.

For the detailed security status of lucene-solr please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/lucene-solr

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5Rgr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: