[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2432-1] jupyter-notebook security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2432-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                          Abhijith PA
November 19, 2020                             https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : jupyter-notebook
Version        : 4.2.3-4+deb9u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2018-8768 CVE-2018-19351 CVE-2018-21030
Debian Bug     : 893436 917409

Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in jupyter-notebook.

CVE-2018-8768

    A maliciously forged notebook file can bypass sanitization to execute
    Javascript in the notebook context. Specifically, invalid HTML is
    'fixed' by jQuery after sanitization, making it dangerous.

CVE-2018-19351

    allows XSS via an untrusted notebook because nbconvert responses are
    considered to have the same origin as the notebook server.

CVE-2018-21030

    jupyter-notebook does not use a CSP header to treat served files as
    belonging to a separate origin. Thus, for example, an XSS payload can
    be placed in an SVG document.

For Debian 9 stretch, these problems have been fixed in version
4.2.3-4+deb9u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your jupyter-notebook packages.

For the detailed security status of jupyter-notebook please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/jupyter-notebook

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=luvs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: