[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2473-1] vips security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2473-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                          Adrian Bunk
November 30, 2020                             https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : vips
Version        : 8.4.5-1+deb9u2
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-20739

In VIPS, an image processing system, an uninitialized variable which may 
cause the leakage of remote server path or stack address was fixed.

For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version
8.4.5-1+deb9u2.

We recommend that you upgrade your vips packages.

For the detailed security status of vips please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/vips

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=EJnf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: