[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2555-1] netty security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2555-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                           Chris Lamb
February 11, 2021                             https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : netty
Version        : 1:4.1.7-2+deb9u3
CVE ID         : CVE-2021-21290

It was discovered that there was an insecure temporary file issue
that could have lead to disclosure of arbitrary local files.

For Debian 9 "Stretch", this problem has been fixed in version
1:4.1.7-2+deb9u3.

We recommend that you upgrade your netty packages.

For the detailed security status of netty please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/netty

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=oCJA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: