[SECURITY] [DLA 2593-1] ca-certificates whitelist Symantec CA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2593-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Utkarsh Gupta
March 14, 2021 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : ca-certificates
Version : 20200601~deb9u2
Debian Bug : 962596
This update reverts the Symantec CA blacklist (which was originally
#911289). The following root certificates were added back (+):
+ "GeoTrust Global CA"
+ "GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority"
+ "GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority - G2"
+ "GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority - G3"
+ "GeoTrust Universal CA"
+ "thawte Primary Root CA"
+ "thawte Primary Root CA - G2"
+ "thawte Primary Root CA - G3"
+ "VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G4"
+ "VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G5"
+ "VeriSign Universal Root Certification Authority"
NOTE: due to bug #743339, CA certificates added back in this version
won't automatically be trusted again on upgrade. Affected users may
need to reconfigure the package to restore the desired state.
For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version
20200601~deb9u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your ca-certificates packages.
For the detailed security status of ca-certificates please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/ca-certificates
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=2JAb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: