[SECURITY] [DLA 2848-1] libssh2 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2848-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Anton Gladky
December 17, 2021 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : libssh2
Version : 1.7.0-1+deb9u2
CVE ID : CVE-2019-13115 CVE-2019-17498
Two issues have been discovered in libssh2, a client-side C library implementing
the SSH2 protocol:
CVE-2019-13115:
kex_method_diffie_hellman_group_exchange_sha256_key_exchange in kex.c has
an integer overflow that could lead to an out-of-bounds read in the way
packets are read from the server. A remote attacker who compromises a
SSH server may be able to disclose sensitive information or cause a denial
of service condition on the client system when a user connects to the server.
CVE-2019-17498:
SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT logic in packet.c has an integer overflow in a bounds check,
enabling an attacker to specify an arbitrary (out-of-bounds) offset for a
subsequent memory read. A crafted SSH server may be able to disclose sensitive
information or cause a denial of service condition on the client system when
a user connects to the server.
For Debian 9 stretch, these problems have been fixed in version
1.7.0-1+deb9u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your libssh2 packages.
For the detailed security status of libssh2 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libssh2
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=e/qE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: