[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2850-1] libpcap security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2850-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                          Adrian Bunk
December 26, 2021                             https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libpcap
Version        : 1.8.1-3+deb9u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2019-15165
Debian Bug     : 941697

Improper PHB header length validation was fixed in libpcap,
a library for capturing network traffic.

For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version
1.8.1-3+deb9u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your libpcap packages.

For the detailed security status of libpcap please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libpcap

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5bpO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: