[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2856-1] okular security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2856-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                          Adrian Bunk
December 27, 2021                             https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : okular
Version        : 4:16.08.2-1+deb9u2
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-9359
Debian Bug     : 954891

Code execution via an action link in a PDF document was fixed in the
KDE document viewer Okular.

For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version
4:16.08.2-1+deb9u2.

We recommend that you upgrade your okular packages.

For the detailed security status of okular please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/okular

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0jin
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: