[SECURITY] [DLA 3075-1] schroot security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3075-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
August 18, 2022 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : schroot
Version : 1.6.10-6+deb10u1
CVE ID : CVE-2022-2787
Julian Gilbey discovered that schroot, a tool allowing users to execute
commands in a chroot environment, had too permissive rules on chroot or
session names, allowing a denial of service on the schroot service for
all users that may start a schroot session.
Note that existing chroots and sessions are checked during upgrade, and
an upgrade is aborted if any future invalid name is detected.
Problematic session and chroots can be checked before upgrading with the
following command:
schroot --list --all | LC_ALL=C grep -vE '^[a-z]+:[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_.-]*$'
See
<https://codeberg.org/shelter/reschroot/src/tag/release/reschroot-1.6.13/NEWS#L10-L41>
for instructions on how to resolve such a situation.
For Debian 10 buster, this problem has been fixed in version
1.6.10-6+deb10u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your schroot packages.
For the detailed security status of schroot please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/schroot
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=CHZ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: