[SECURITY] [DLA 3146-1] isc-dhcp security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3146-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Utkarsh Gupta
October 11, 2022 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : isc-dhcp
Version : 4.4.1-2+deb10u2
CVE ID : CVE-2022-2928 CVE-2022-2929
Debian Bug : 1021320
Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the ISC DHCP client,
relay and server.
CVE-2022-2928
It was discovered that the DHCP server does not correctly perform
option reference counting when configured with "allow leasequery;".
A remote attacker can take advantage of this flaw to cause a denial
of service (daemon crash).
CVE-2022-2929
It was discovered that the DHCP server is prone to a memory leak
flaw when handling contents of option 81 (fqdn) data received in
a DHCP packet. A remote attacker can take advantage of this flaw
to cause DHCP servers to consume resources, resulting in denial
of service.
For Debian 10 buster, these problems have been fixed in version
4.4.1-2+deb10u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your isc-dhcp packages.
For the detailed security status of isc-dhcp please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/isc-dhcp
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEbJ0QSEqa5Mw4X3xxgj6WdgbDS5YFAmNEricACgkQgj6WdgbD
S5bA3RAApiw0WHKiK9fhN4XELlVFGmWrEnFmyGa1c0v7jkYWaz1rRHC0dMKIlIvh
Ve36YrAqk+Y+XwaAGImNRguFjCKEPUWPaAj/6/xyN8rOT2Aq2ITwLJ3Dh/QQ907z
1GIvHTuUjvG+iVa7jZYHGG9s8f4KFM23SGLUSvM1OFZK0gCDExX8zgxvDBHxZBQz
IEfoLrkzNvJy/iGtknug7vVBbN2fJQNx1cs33FYhZIib+oA/Ec66VufRVKYI3N7S
0JZn3sMFrZut0IzbBVz43inD3Gy2Ekis2Szvyip0S4xC5XmW0D2Wvns9KyLPKezR
+D7hOYDZ3eYJMsnfRPm1rceB48J3WQSqkDGud7lEZkhWwhoWXa98jE5EucvhYGQ4
XRaMcevk8Kr00iVs3W0ygAJzSWT7kyvaQEr+Bep4qCWHelQQH7fsvEeaScYRiWUE
IE6reX6zHyNTx9xQgL4Q2Nui6jmqhCX5DggGYC+7DPPgAd15vHUMo6UES2Kwsw4/
2tFTPVC73FklTmteQYnWTr5v1zWM/ZDTmaCdzd4YtBG4uLzMLD60M5DTyUgTTPAf
bs+6Hne+/kV2Vh0ZsQO5zz61hirqlFmrpu1dBtSw5VDsx+obQBqLo8HOA/JK6Kir
Y2R0uJxFIGifqLkcZUq6pSDfOl72gFhK/UrTA0+V9ZX1IA1h7Ek=
=lF65
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: