[SECURITY] [DLA 3246-1] node-hawk security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3246-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Chris Lamb
December 23, 2022 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : node-hawk
Version : 6.0.1+dfsg-1+deb10u1
CVE IDs : CVE-2022-29167
It was discovered that there was an issue in Hawk, an HTTP
authentication scheme. Hawk used a regular expression to parse `Host`
HTTP headers which was subject to regular expression DoS attack. Each
added character in the attacker's input increased the computation
time exponentially.
For Debian 10 buster, this problem has been fixed in version
6.0.1+dfsg-1+deb10u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your node-hawk packages.
For the detailed security status of node-hawk please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/node-hawk
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwv5L0nHBObhsUz5GHpU+J9QxHlgFAmOlSUoACgkQHpU+J9Qx
HlhNdg//Uh/J87xJoT7+oUBVlpX5Ll33QWdB+zsvBg7ddOa4P/DZV/Cpuhdz8I9z
PUkLyJn1r8M0NIDL8hyYvzgrNRden2tuGrFFHi+xGnfFwlKGVGtGlZRZ8XDioGrL
pb1KV83dPfVIQaO8uQVSuImh7XCqu/5R/eT6RfzQ90ulW4s1JIy4wMJmD+aH1O43
rRW/2OLYkYXVOMll9uAXZaWNLbse3pw7eRppJp7XPct94d3maTidODD2XCVsEd8t
RIz8cK9yMV13INKs8Apt7SWdWWgdf3Aj8F5idAmWB4tKoBYjYU6+R8/r4wISVU+J
aBcviqGKxtTUWxvBp0oP5403y+6aHTDu5Y+slrVN2JmGsCqRljVVabzYyZSnxFq1
IIp+j88RbsBq64IIIFlxiUPMLYE4r85ysGmjREndmPsFiFxZkXHLLFVq9Gw/Iij6
BpdaC4ED6Fz0HgGltTQRVQMTxPrr6McFZmGuh7equwtxorpHmLca1jVmHXqif9R3
dWpNkQ9FaNuq2PNUiScyXp8oOcwGBp27nzv6EhVf4GeXQ0Oins/8hn02z3bBRdwB
yQLsa3ylGPfaGzGAYNZZ9zYbNexaFaBzt/GvVWxijC8Ab3zrGlsIRTdIWSue2KK0
p0oRpOU9uE+9nDNdp22gzVOO2dp57yqUcnwAz1CzB9Mkm53pj1Q=
=M6eO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: