[SECURITY] [DLA 3449-1] openssl security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3449-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Sylvain Beucler
June 08, 2023 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : openssl
Version : 1.1.1n-0+deb10u5
CVE ID : CVE-2023-0464 CVE-2023-0465 CVE-2023-0466 CVE-2023-2650
Debian Bug : 1034720
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenSSL, a Secure
Sockets Layer toolkit.
CVE-2023-0464
David Benjamin reported a flaw related to the verification of
X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints, which
may result in denial of service.
CVE-2023-0465
David Benjamin reported that invalid certificate policies in leaf
certificates are silently ignored. A malicious CA could take
advantage of this flaw to deliberately assert invalid certificate
policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate
altogether.
CVE-2023-0466
David Benjamin discovered that the implementation of the
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function does not enable the check
which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to
pass the certificate verification (contrary to its documentation).
CVE-2023-2650
It was discovered that processing malformed ASN.1 object
identifiers or data may result in denial of service.
For Debian 10 buster, these problems have been fixed in version
1.1.1n-0+deb10u5.
We recommend that you upgrade your openssl packages.
For the detailed security status of openssl please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openssl
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE1vEOfV7HXWKqBieIDTl9HeUlXjAFAmSCAC0ACgkQDTl9HeUl
XjDvGhAAqpyvPxEaITtkgue/yTpuiW/0dJnfmVDnZm06hJO33SQRrRGdVitMHJkE
jf0blBzV5mKaFYawFiUgne1B07iuvwITL9svt+KkKRYAUitq1iKt9qxMAN612wHk
xgwbRYeq2q+rhcfuSkv+Wqhv0iJJmGi9WMR8hIQXVsHKYfukz8oU4tiVSxev1ICw
kynhb25RG37eobHS4PzIotK/wK/2qTfYW36vYJ38vNH9IzW8kXCs2GOGBoyUgMz3
qw71M1GYslV9ZhEWI03bb9QTBTEjAwsad2bA9xHWcJZXu3fhVNR3ysFROtzFs95i
HiU6l1UR7GDMZadiFBeWzt4ZHzJ/hb3KPeTHftXboGKPsfXRo5CRjhLxVMxlwlsq
o4BKqWtUxVdOp7O4L0XOkINf0ftJPZrLMaIb+2m9fZeUMQA4iuza+Pb84LlmqB2C
/Dn7RBBbWOKZxKVNCmUDXvXYpnWfkVYCnT2QA6+1GxWjJhMboF+oSwPcfvJZDhp+
MXTQpdZsS1BadGnLK6vtPcxqt30VXKF8mW0xfiWvrx0NR359nvMhnHqqste4tJdl
Pk8OXPDF9XZUsmn38ivkF9JbXO//kAmK0atGbSq5c3Jyu+4jPyp+YasgAODQDsRe
VUId4ukzCDqrVj1kHZFmdIUbii92cAvK60y8CKcaUhD9vUNTYBw=
=ULLg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: