[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2717-1] xml-security-c security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2717-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
June 28, 2013                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : xml-security-c
Vulnerability  : heap overflow
Problem type   : local (remote)
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-2210
Debian Bug     : 714241

Jon Erickson of iSIGHT Partners Labs discovered a heap overflow in
xml-security-c, an implementation of the XML Digital Security
specification. The fix to address CVE-2013-2154 introduced the
possibility of a heap overflow in the processing of malformed XPointer
expressions in the XML Signature Reference processing code, possibly
leading to arbitrary code execution.

For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.5.1-3+squeeze3.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.6.1-5+deb7u2.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.6.1-7.

We recommend that you upgrade your xml-security-c packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRzaDrAAoJEHidbwV/2GP+ypYQAKE0uiu5ldrC60pukEYiU1d8
epTenJbhaYhzb2FxKETjMtLI+46nooId6ptCCWXwwVZ1PfhaaTO6CJkPuk9MJTZa
K8Du0hfa8aNp6Ahp+3/zEEnnwvRVW2EoFB7BHXc1DOY+fmGuSoL1Yty5jwAiOJd3
NjcuJMWcJk8TtYEYH3JsNQiJVliR67YlxgYKnpFKfCtJu/NeVxgFZymz6u6bkeVU
19XZW+xOypFGPi0H3w5sZEd5OZIo7lhettUHg1IJOAVulX3f7Ad1cxOhtns2HJoq
3qpcKm9iMr5aQ0c1qKFWhdiMecrxBd7TOjsPJ1lBpm6j5mT0uKgfTq/oPvh6jLHN
bnhBdV65wkhb13umgGLwxoHDdk0Gd1prTy9i3lAnJrXCptZ3Ye4vIjNfOk7DMnV4
iy4fj+Maky5U1EzdOcst0NkMkk/Nx71QVdwDd5D/6pMVogNDpYm9jHrjkkhrH2Hq
vZ3ja9SnRL8qXK7zPWZ3Ub2CjcJLxtN9p0tK4M9U/4DalIZry0gAASiy3887FS2h
Z9Y1TN8Sga3LMKL2FzYzERlt0wsHpilDqVUcPxBk7p5pA65TjRHIxK9fxoFwownD
yPU+nb70th8vyU9jJH/+sidPau07Zk1sqxS79Ndf1z9YD1/KyMU7lOIkVXH4KNO4
Fa+JknxCcr25IQJXNB31
=fVio
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: