[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2731-1] libgcrypt11 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2731-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                           Thijs Kinkhorst
July 29, 2013                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libgcrypt11
Vulnerability  : information leak
Problem type   : local
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-4242

Yarom and Falkner discovered that RSA secret keys in applications using
the libgcrypt11 library, for example GnuPG 2.x, could be leaked via
a side channel attack, where a malicious local user could obtain private
key information from another user on the system.

For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.4.5-2+squeeze1.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.5.0-5+deb7u1.

For the testing distribution (jessie) and unstable distribution (sid),
this problem has been fixed in version 1.5.3-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your libgcrypt11 packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR9rLaAAoJEFb2GnlAHawEU0kIAIH6NtLVkDhlJ2y63vxpNiUf
bD3YPLTeRjQYkvy/ZBlb6U1TArpZIoXUcPj6N0+yvzXzr7rFbXATA5NhaeYr7UEx
Zpy08YPCE0rXb9D7O1Qigw7OP1z5HBypRjN76KDSbuu3xDV37CvXU1CjTL8r0qAZ
lUe8M59D47MRhnJh/aiAr2djXQDtofjYIWv6M2RhVoGSrFpXrMmCA45DVRRG6Ipo
6tUj3BwB49traxetRyx6CpCVQ3VkwWYjFvpuJUlOETnJ2tg6wmYqKsPpRVVYVDu9
mO4yTP25n+3hMwY9fmJNfRhYZHoYpp6hwaVCIBV8gHbk7i3yjSm/1jNXp/rnifs=
=12+1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: