[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2810-1] ruby1.9.1 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2810-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
December 04, 2013                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : ruby1.9.1
Vulnerability  : heap overflow
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-4164
Debian Bug     : 730178

Charlie Somerville discovered that Ruby incorrectly handled floating
point number conversion. If an application using Ruby accepted untrusted
input strings and converted them to floating point numbers, an attacker
able to provide such input could cause the application to crash or,
possibly, execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the application.

For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.9.2.0-2+deb6u2.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.9.3.194-8.1+deb7u2.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.9.3.484-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your ruby1.9.1 packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSn6paAAoJEAVMuPMTQ89EppAP/3gJqyFH2O8X54DRK9kWPegb
Y02HT+HhDvCIxTRsMZFndelL2Q5ATvajMfygBxIGhp/Um72uoS6SvSX1qsB2KM+o
wWG2L/NeuV9x2QlJIoMpAC1BFSMHSUz+s1/DypkaoXyM0NaczLHxqOBHTc8OcGM5
8o+TfalFNBvwiJB9JpSqODMZqRVJwLISHtm8d5PTIqwJ+s4NRq9q+URZzWLArSmI
bne2ZX/I7ZJF5bljMfS2DybSZiGd0EOY7j1Wh9FMQOBFWcaGC7LtAKL/GixHs6aq
2ac0sWFd0osQdMlmQ4raTkeP9wqmxxA6r8t1IGvBQskn0wpwP49PA3ZbsWWW7M3F
qwnIuRen+Qqpr5K0rcmB4NUmTSbC9CRYeRVlgulJHOQk3H+RDOCMtyr61Pb4yA0+
U9Cb6iytERXqz6gXve4CNX8HgojTj8UF+RwELmh6c8oOp4bawvW/43iZDjkyyPyL
EE7rXAraEaHGa94kkfPO0ijLQB9jcPJOECatNtj62FYEgmAIDxBNnEfWxGgXFC1p
jxvUmLbliVMQ7RnWDkrtthnm/7zS9iHZ9/JAhVbKwITxlCvZGjG84Iaofb5UW+wR
nZw5lL6YydwrXPJoj0ZpWrPobMSZ/aATp0kiS5IJdLTwyZqoapVRXCZHhOmbyeh4
J2FfysOY3Wmx7cLiM6Bb
=5fWg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: