[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2815-1] munin security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2815-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
December 09, 2013                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : munin
Vulnerability  : denial of service
Problem type   : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-6048 CVE-2013-6359

Christoph Biedl discovered two denial of service vulnerabilities in
munin, a network-wide graphing framework. The Common Vulnerabilities and
Exposures project identifies the following problems:

CVE-2013-6048

    The Munin::Master::Node module of munin does not properly validate
    certain data a node sends. A malicious node might exploit this to
    drive the munin-html process into an infinite loop with memory
    exhaustion on the munin master.

CVE-2013-6359

    A malicious node, with a plugin enabled using "multigraph" as a
    multigraph service name, can abort data collection for the entire
    node the plugin runs on.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.0.6-4+deb7u2.

For the testing distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.0.18-1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.0.18-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your munin packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=dUQV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: