[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 2870-1] libyaml-libyaml-perl security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2870-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
March 08, 2014                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libyaml-libyaml-perl
Vulnerability  : heap-based buffer overflow
CVE ID         : CVE-2013-6393

Florian Weimer of the Red Hat Product Security Team discovered a
heap-based buffer overflow flaw in LibYAML, a fast YAML 1.1 parser and
emitter library. A remote attacker could provide a YAML document with a
specially-crafted tag that, when parsed by an application using libyaml,
would cause the application to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary
code with the privileges of the user running the application.

This update corrects this flaw in the copy that is embedded in the
libyaml-libyaml-perl package.

For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.33-1+squeeze2.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.38-3+deb7u1.

For the testing distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.41-4.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.41-4.

We recommend that you upgrade your libyaml-libyaml-perl packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=fvig
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: