[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3067-1] qemu-kvm security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3067-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
November 06, 2014                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : qemu-kvm
CVE ID         : CVE-2014-3689 CVE-2014-7815

Several vulnerabilities were discovered in qemu-kvm, a full
virtualization solution on x86 hardware.

CVE-2014-3689

    The Advanced Threat Research team at Intel Security reported that
    guest provided parameter were insufficiently validated in
    rectangle functions in the vmware-vga driver. A privileged guest
    user could use this flaw to write into qemu address space on the
    host, potentially escalating their privileges to those of the
    qemu host process.

CVE-2014-7815

    James Spadaro of Cisco reported insufficiently sanitized
    bits_per_pixel from the client in the QEMU VNC display driver. An
    attacker having access to the guest's VNC console could use this
    flaw to crash the guest.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.1.2+dfsg-6+deb7u5.

We recommend that you upgrade your qemu-kvm packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=tlpB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: