[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3154-1] ntp security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3154-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
February 05, 2015                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : ntp
CVE ID         : CVE-2014-9297 CVE-2014-9298

Several vulnerabilities were discovered in the ntp package, an
implementation of the Network Time Protocol. The Common Vulnerabilities
and Exposures project identifies the following problems:

CVE-2014-9297

    Stephen Roettger of the Google Security Team, Sebastian Krahmer of
    the SUSE Security Team and Harlan Stenn of Network Time Foundation
    discovered that the length value in extension fields is not properly
    validated in several code paths in ntp_crypto.c, which could lead to
    information leakage or denial of service (ntpd crash).

CVE-2014-9298

    Stephen Roettger of the Google Security Team reported that ACLs
    based on IPv6 ::1 addresses can be bypassed.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-2+deb7u2.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:4.2.6.p5+dfsg-4.

We recommend that you upgrade your ntp packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=uHbR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: