[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3185-1] libgcrypt11 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3185-1                   security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/                        Alessandro Ghedini
March 12, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : libgcrypt11
CVE ID         : CVE-2014-3591 CVE-2015-0837

Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in libgcrypt:

CVE-2014-3591

    The Elgamal decryption routine was susceptible to a side-channel
    attack discovered by researchers of Tel Aviv University. Ciphertext
    blinding was enabled to counteract it. Note that this may have a
    quite noticeable impact on Elgamal decryption performance.

CVE-2015-0837

    The modular exponentiation routine mpi_powm() was susceptible to a
    side-channel attack caused by data-dependent timing variations when
    accessing its internal pre-computed table.

For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.5.0-5+deb7u3.

We recommend that you upgrade your libgcrypt11 packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVAdKBAAoJEFb2GnlAHawEGYoIAJDR41vTx6S3mVQBcaaZ+p3Y
kZiMLHqySwXhoLC1T5/X3vwuNk1nO/rbAJsvLo27dRJGCqd7EvhyUYJ9dmo9resN
9ryNUh2e0T6EJ/rt3ytldxE4fRwGL68yIQU7aGcyw1fxh26LHA2NHV+FDdVTylse
EM+HuC2sBLijC7MYsYq9iR0TQi8jiQJqVAijlz8ArvsuOFvqXqqBGsmOplW6cJpP
5y4C9h2tl0pT0JOC1mZEqmalSqCPdxHRNMI8mnz4V/QFvxkAE0kvlLxTGJW5zwje
PO/2eilKsCMqb/q1ccBWsKp4q7OL8f5jAfIy4Aurx014PCp71NxGvzzaTnK3yjA=
=+M3h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: