[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3335-1] request-tracker4 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3335-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
August 13, 2015                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : request-tracker4
CVE ID         : CVE-2015-5475

It was discovered that Request Tracker, an extensible trouble-ticket
tracking system is susceptible to a cross-site scripting attack via the
user an group rights management pages (CVE-2015-5475) and via the
cryptography interface, allowing an attacker with a carefully-crafted
key to inject JavaScript into RT's user interface. Installations which
use neither GnuPG nor S/MIME are unaffected by the second cross-site
scripting vulnerability.

For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
in version 4.0.7-5+deb7u4. The oldstable distribution (wheezy) is only
affected by CVE-2015-5475.

For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 4.2.8-3+deb8u1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 4.2.11-2.

We recommend that you upgrade your request-tracker4 packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Aes9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: